supreme court.jpgCo-authored by Richard Alfred and Patrick Bannon

Is a class action permitted if each class member’s damages would have to be proven separately rather than measured on a class-wide basis?

The Supreme Court’s 5 – 4 majority opinion today in Comcast Corp. v. Behrend raises this fundamental question.  The implications for wage and hour class and collective actions

Continue Reading Did The Earth Just Move? Comcast Suggests Individual Damage Calculations Prevent Class Certification

Fourth Circuit.bmpCo-authored by Richard Alfred and Kevin Young

Since the Supreme Court decided Dukes v. Wal-Mart in June 2011, litigants have wrestled over its impact on wage-hour class and collective actions.  Plaintiffs typically argue that Dukes should be limited to its context—a mega Title VII discrimination case brought as a Rule 23(b)(2) class action.  Defendant-employers respond—correctly in our view—that the principles

Continue Reading Fourth Circuit Tells Wage and Hour Plaintiffs to Put Up With Dukes

Seventh Circuit.jpgCo-authored by Laura Reasons, Giselle Donado, and Noah Finkel

In an opinion likely to make it more difficult for wage-hour plaintiffs to certify a class action and maintain certification of a collective action, the Seventh Circuit affirmed the Western District of Wisconsin’s decertification decision in Espenscheid v. DirectSat USA, LLC on the grounds that trial was not manageable

Continue Reading Seventh Circuit Raises The Bar On Collective And Class Certification of Wage-Hour Claims

seyfarth.jpgAuthored by Rachel M. Hoffer

We’ve all heard the oft-cited statistic that women in the U.S. earn 77 cents for every dollar paid their male counterparts, despite the passage of laws targeted to remedy this disparity.  For the third time in four years, Congressional Democrats have introduced a bill intended to give the Equal Pay Act of 1963 sharper teeth. 

Continue Reading Sex Bomb: Democrats Push Paycheck Fairness Act–Again

Generic Seal.bmpCo-authored by:  Jeremy W. Stewart and Kyle Petersen

On January 10, 2013, U.S. District Judge Barbara Crabb of the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin issued an order denying the plaintiffs’ motion for class and collective action certification of unpaid meal period claims in Boelk, et al. v. AT&T Teleholdings, Inc., et al., No. 3:12-cv-0040-bbc

Continue Reading Dukesing It Out: Tighter Post-Dukes Standard Helps Defeat Request For Class and Collective Action Certification

supreme court.jpgCo-Authored by Richard Alfred, Patrick Bannon and Jessica Schauer Lieberman

In the year and a half since the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, litigants, courts and even the Supreme Court itself have continued to analyze the legal standard for certification of Rule 23 class actions.  The Supreme Court heard oral argument yesterday

Continue Reading Supreme Court Considers Evidence Needed for Certification of Broad(band) Class

bduking.jpgCo-authored by Richard Alfred and Kevin Young

It has been more than a year since the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, and its impact on wage and hour class actions remains hotly debated.  While plaintiffs’ attorneys have argued that the decision is limited substantively to discrimination cases and procedurally to Rule 23(b)(2) class actions

Continue Reading Still Duking it Out: Ninth Circuit Considers Impact of Dukes on Wage and Hour Class Actions

newspaperboy.jpg

Co-Authored by: Jeffrey A. Berman and Anthony J. Musante

On July 2, 2012, the California Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court ruling denying class certification to a group of newspaper carriers claiming they were misclassified as independent contractors.  In Sotelo v. Medianews Group, Inc., the Court of Appeal concluded that plaintiffs’  proposed class of newspaper carriers could not

Continue Reading Court of Appeal Delivers On Newspaper Carrier Misclassification Case

Blog-DispAttFees.bmpAuthored by Noah Finkel and Abad Lopez

Last month, a federal district court in Maryland rejected a proposed FLSA settlement as unreasonable based on the amount of the proposed attorney’s fees.  In Gionfriddo v. Zinc, et al., the Court compared the amount the individual plaintiffs were to recover ($15,000.18) to the proposed attorney’s fees ($100,000), and found the disproportionate

Continue Reading Should Disproportionate Attorney’s Fees Doom Proposed FLSA Settlements?

law-book-271x300.jpgAuthored by:  Noah Finkel, Brett Bartlett, Andrew Paley and Richard Alfred

Members of Seyfarth Shaw’s Wage and Hour Litigation Practice Group have authored Wage & Hour Collective and Class Litigation, the first-of-its kind treatise on wage and hour litigation. Published by American Lawyer Media’s Law Journal Press, the 912-page volume is the most comprehensive guide published to

Continue Reading Seyfarth Shaw “Writes the Book” on Wage-Hour Litigation