Co-authored by Colleen Regan and David Kadue

Gentry is dead.  Back in 2007, the California Supreme Court, in Gentry v. Superior Court held that California public policy favoring class actions was so important that employers cannot have employees, in arbitration agreements, waive their right to pursue a class action.  Many thought that the Gentry rule contradicted the Federal Arbitration Act,
Continue Reading BREAKING NEWS RE CALIFORNIA CLASS ACTION WAIVERS: GENTRY IS DEAD; LONG LIVE PAGA.

Co-authored by Christina F. Jackson and Julie G. Yap

While employers have been waiting patiently for the California Supreme Court’s decision regarding the enforceability of class and representative action waivers in arbitration agreements, last week, a California federal court jumped into the fray and held that state law rules are powerless against the broad preemptive power of the Federal
Continue Reading Preempt This! California Federal Court Holds that Federal Law Preempts State Law Rules Against Waivers in Arbitration Agreements

Authored by Jim Harris

The California Supreme Court heard oral argument in two important cases involving employment-related class actions.  From the tenor of and comments made at the argument, it appears likely that the ultimate results will be a mixed bag for employers.

The first case, Iskanian v. CLS Transportation of Los Angeles, LLC, which we reported on late
Continue Reading Let’s Play Two: California Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in Two Important Class Action Cases

Co-authored by Joshua Seidman and Nadia Bandukda

D.R. Horton Who?  Who is not the question here, it is why and what is going on with the NLRB saga?  Last week, the NLRB filed a petition for rehearing with the Fifth Circuit seeking reconsideration and reversal of the appellate court’s December 2013 decision regarding employee class action waivers. 

The Board’s petition
Continue Reading D.R. Horton Rehears a Who: NLRB Files Petition for Rehearing with Fifth Circuit

Fourth Circuit.bmpAuthored by Robert S. Whitman

In a decision that management lawyers hope was not an April Fool’s prank, the Fourth Circuit earlier this week upheld an arbitration agreement with a class action waiver, reversing a district court decision that held the waiver unenforceable.

In so holding, the appeals court signaled its continued adherence to the holding in AT&T Mobility LLC

Continue Reading Concepcion Prevails Again: Class Action Waiver Upheld by Fourth Circuit

California Flag.bmpBy Julie Yap and Brandon McKelvey

As this blog recently covered, in September the California Supreme Court granted review in Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC to decide whether class action waivers in employment arbitration agreements are enforceable under California law.  This week, another Court of Appeal added its opinion on this issue, holding that despite the United

Continue Reading California Court Attempts To Navigate Around AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, Holding A Class Action Waiver In An Employment Arbitration Agreement Is Unenforceable, On The Same Day The U.S. Supreme Court Rejects A Similar Attempt By The Oklahoma Supreme Court

Mass.jpgCo-authored by Richard Alfred and James Hlawek

A Massachusetts Superior Court judge recently invalidated an arbitration class action waiver, even though the U.S. Supreme Court found in its AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion ruling earlier this year that federal law preempts state laws that interfere with an employer’s ability to enforce arbitration agreements with class action waivers.  This ruling shows

Continue Reading Your Arbitration Class Action Waiver May Not Be Enforceable in Massachusetts